Republican lawmakers in Washington, D.C., are advancing an effort to ward off the potential threat of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), a proposed electronic currency that would be centrally controlled by the federal government or the Federal Reserve.
A coalition of Senate Republicans, led by Sens. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), Ted Budd (R-N.C.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), and Ted Cruz (R-Texas), have introduced the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act (S. 3801).
The legislation aims to prevent the Federal Reserve, which is not a government body, from issuing a CBDC, either directly to individuals or indirectly through financial institutions or third parties. Furthermore, it bars the Federal Reserve from leveraging a CBDC to enact monetary policies without explicit authorization from Congress.
This legislative effort is a clear response to growing concerns over government overreach and the potential for financial surveillance.
Unlike bitcoin, which is decentralized, not controlled by any third-party, and subject to clearly established immutable rules enforced by anonymous node operators, a CBDC controlled by the Federal Reserve or the federal government would be vulnerable to potentially limitless abuses of Americans’ constitutional rights.
A CBDC could come with programmable limitations, such as limits on the amount of red meat an individual could buy or prohibitions on purchasing firearms.
CBDCs would also permit an unprecedented level of surveillance on the activities of everyday, law-abiding Americans.
In speaking to the bill, Sen. Hagerty highlighted the urgency based on past government actions, such as Operation Chokepoint and allegations of financial profiling by FinCEN.
For Hagerty, such federal malfeasance and abuse of power provides evidence of the government’s willingness to misuse the financial system for political purposes.
The bill has garnered support from a wide array of organizations, including Heritage Action for America, the Blockchain Association, the American Bankers Association, the Independent Community Bankers Association, and Club for Growth, all of whom recognize the significant risks a CBDC poses to individual privacy, financial freedom, and the stability of the American financial system.
The introduction of this bill follows the New York Federal Reserve Bank’s recent announcement of a partnership with major global financial institutions to explore the concept of a digital dollar. This initiative, part of the Fed’s “Innovation Center,” aims to test the feasibility of a CBDC in a simulated environment, signaling a growing interest in digital currencies at the highest levels of financial governance.
The debate over CBDCs and digital currencies is not just about technology but the fundamental values of freedom, privacy, and autonomy in the digital age. Proponents of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin argue that decentralized digital currencies offer a viable alternative to government-controlled currencies, promoting financial freedom and privacy.
In Maine, Sen. Eric Brakey (R-Androscoggin) has also taken a stand against the CBDC with an amendment to LD 91, a bill originally feared to pave the way for a CBDC while potentially excluding cryptocurrencies like bitcoin from the definition of “money.”
Brakey’s amendment ensures that the bill will not support or implement a CBDC, marking a significant victory for advocates of financial privacy and cryptocurrency.
As the debate over CBDCs continues to unfold, it’s clear that the stakes are high.
The decisions made today could define the future of financial privacy, freedom, and the role of government in the digital economy.
Where is the illustrious Sen. Collins, Maine’s champion of financial privacy, freedom and the role of government in the digital economy? Keep looking. You won’t find her.