Elected Democrats in Augusta continue to leverage last year’s mass shooting in Lewiston in order to secure passage of long-sought gun control measures that wouldn’t even have stopped the Oct. 25 killing spree carried out by Army Reservist Robert R. Card, Jr.
Democratic lawmakers signalled their intention to advance a so-called “Red Flag” law late Wednesday evening after spending much of the 2024 legislative session haggling with Republicans and Gov. Janet Mills over separate gun control proposals.
[RELATED: Troy Jackson Backs Gun Control After Gun Control Group Hires His Son’s Firm…]
Maine’s Judiciary Committee will hold a public hearing to discuss a significant change in gun laws, but hasn’t announced when the hearing will be or how much notice the public will be given before the bill is discussed.
“I think it’s absolutely absurd that on March 28 we’re referencing major substantive public policy to committee in which a public hearing is going to be held with little or no notice to the public,” said Sen. Matt Harrington (R-York).
[RELATED: Maine Dems Hold Closed-Door Meeting with ATF Official Amid Push for Stricter Gun Control Measures…]
The bill, LD 2283, would be a significant expansion of Maine’s already existing “yellow-flag” law into a stricter “red-flag” law, making it much easier for the state government to seize firearms from people deemed a threat.
Sen. Harrington was outraged at the decision to hold a public hearing on the controversial bill without advanced notice to the public, which will likely result in lower public attendance.
Harrington asked Sen. Anne Carney (D-Cumberland) how much notice Mainers will have before the bill is given a hearing, but she could not answer, claiming that the scheduling depends “to some extent” on the availability of American Sign Language interpreters.
[RELATED: Top Maine Democrat to Hunters: Support Gun Control If You Want to Keep Hunting…]
The surprise move is just the latest in a series of legislative maneuvers the Democrat-controlled legislature has used to drop major pieces of legislation with little notice to the public.
Using last-minute amendments to so-called “concept drafts,” lawmakers can unveil legislation days — or even minutes — before a public hearing. The tactic ensures that those who oppose a given measure will be unable to take time off from work and arrange to be at the State House to testify on the bill.
Currently, Maine law provides for the temporary removal of firearms from someone deemed to pose an extreme risk to himself or others, allowing family members to contact law enforcement with their concerns.
Police will then take the person into protective custody if they deem the risk to be credible.
After being taken into protective custody, the gun owner will be given a mental health examination by a doctor.
If, after the exam, the person is determined to be mentally ill, and the medical professional and law enforcement agree that he poses an extreme risk, police can request a court order allowing for the temporary removal of his firearms.
Only then can a court temporarily remove someone’s firearms.
An independent commission tasked with investigating the Lewiston mass shooting found that the existing Yellow Flag law could have been used and should have been used in the case of Robert Card.
Law enforcement were informed of the threat posed by Card, but failed to act in accordance with the laws already on the books.
In that case, it was not the insufficiency of the “yellow-flag” laws which failed to stop Card, but a failure of law enforcement to enforce those laws.
The new gun control bill, sponsored by Maine’s far left House Speaker Rachel Talbot Ross (D-Portland), would significantly streamline the process required to revoke someone’s Second Amendment rights.
Under the new bill, any family member can directly report concerns to a court, which will then hold a hearing within 14 days of the notification and decide whether to revoke someone’s firearm rights for up to one year.
In most cases, the court must notify the subject of the request before the hearing, but, in “emergency” cases, the court can issue a crisis intervention order over the phone without notifying the subject of the order.
“The bill also allows a court to issue an emergency crisis intervention order by telephone
or other reliable electronic means without notice to the person who is the subject of the requested order,” says the bill.
It does not define what constitutes an emergency.
The emergency order removes firearms for up to 14 days, with an actual court hearing scheduled in the same time period.
[RELATED: Cases Less Severe Than Robert Card Triggered Maine’s Yellow Flag Law Firearm Restrictions…]
As Maine Democrats try this last-minute push for stricter gun laws, the Biden Administration is working towards the same goal.
On Saturday, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced the establishment of the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center, which is meant to encourage more states to enact “red-flag” laws.
The center is also meant to instruct officials in “optimizing the usage of red flag laws,” and will help states seeking to implement the laws.
Substitute Gore for General Mills and Xiden… Charlton Heston has very wise words to say:
https://75thbunker.com/from-my-cold-dead-hands-charlton-heston/
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
England’s death rate per capita by gun violence is 497 times lower than ours. They have very strict gun laws and the result is fewer deaths. We on the other hand have the highest gun death rate of any developed nation in the entire world. Your solution is more guns and no restrictions. That’s like telling a drunk driver to drink themselves sober.
Mike Grove?
England has a lower death rate than in Maine? We use the data from the entire country and is massively skewed by places like Chicago that makes the ENTIRE country appear “dangerous”.
Not only that, but the second amendment wasn’t put in place for hunting. The good people of England are at the PURE mercy of their Government. What would have happened if 300 years ago we couldn’t have guns? We’d still be at the mercy of England you fool.
If law enforcement can or will not properly enforce yellow flag laws, who can say they will properly enforce red flag laws? The use of one’s intelligence will tell one that red flag laws – which do not require the due process necessary in yellow flag laws – are much more prone to abuse. Many ignorant, emotionally-driven politicians and activists will jump on the anti-gun band wagon to ultimately bring about a gun-free state that will become a welcome mat for criminals with guns who do not obey laws. Yes – we need to properly remove guns from the hands of people who present danger to themselves and/or others; however, whenever an emotional crises arises and some people seem compelled to “do something” or to “appear to do something” – that is precisely the wrong time to tamper with rights that have served us well and have stood the test of time.
Anne Carney is Cape Elizabeth/South Portland. She lives in a waterfront home with her very wealthy husband.
She is also a sneak and a typical dishonest leftist from out of state who is a grad of Soros’ Emerge America.
The Maine Constitution is clear on gun rights but liberals who want to establish tyranny keep trying to violate it.
And why do these liberal women always look so miserable?
Hmm.. about a month ago I was reading about how the Biden Administration was opening a “National Red Flag Office”…. Recently, Anne Carney has a secrete meeting with the ATF…. Now, suddenly, “at the last minute”…. Anne Carney and her anti-constitution socialists come forward with a Red Flag law that will not be debated (or read, probably) to try to foist on us. Screw this. Vote all these legislators “from away” out of Maine Government.
NEVER give government more power!!!! It is relinquishing your freedoms to those in power who WILL become tyrants
Here’s a counter proposal. Get convicted of a crime with a firearm, 20 years mandatory prison. Then the AG who says that they don’t have the resources to prosecute every case will have the free time cleared by not having repeat offenders. It’s a win-win.
You have a diagnosed senile president with his finger on the button and you do nothing. Until you fix that you can just stfu.
“Never let a crisis go to waste”. Rahm ‘Fooking’ Emanuel, former Mayor of Chicago and Chief of Staff to B. Hussain Obama.So Democrats, don’t just do something, stand there. They don’t even pretend it will stop crime anymore. This is just to exert power and control.
Mike Grove, Israel had strict laws also, how did the work out?
Mike Grove remember we are not a developed nation. We have no defined boarder. Any one can come in. The rules of the game have changed!
Priesendent Trump just attended the wake of a Ney York City killed cop. New York has the strongest gun laws. The shooter and the driver of the car from which the cop was shot both have prior gun violations. It is not the gun but the person holding the gun. And those in the legal system enforcing the laws.
Last month in Monroe county Fl. a 17 year old sent a email stating he was going to kill an other teen. Two days later he was arrested and locked up and bail was set at $500,000.00.
He goes to trial next week as an adult. All can read that message.
Here in Maine we just vote to weaken the law. Good luck!
Instead of weaking the law what have the law make done to protect our homes from squatters–NOTHING!
tyranny at it’s finest