Advocates for a ballot question this fall that would lead the state to take control of Maine’s power grid have said the campaign is about lowering electricity prices and having fewer power outages.
But on Monday night, one of the lead organizers for the campaign, a former co-chair of the Portland Chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, offered a different motivation behind the effort to seize Maine’s powergrid.
“So I’ve been one of the organizers involved in [Pine Tree Power] for a while. And basically we’re part of a coalition to pass a statewide public electric utility, which is an issue that resonates with a lot of working class people here. But importantly on top of the actual policy itself is that our chapter really used the campaign to develop our electoral program,” said Rose DuBois, the Organizing Director for the “Our Power” ballot question campaign committee.
“So just, really using the campaign to build our chapter,” said DuBois.
DuBois’s comments came during a Democratic Socialists of America National Political Committee Candidate Debate Panel on Monday.
[RELATED: Socialist U.S. Senator Endorses State Takeover of Maine’s Power Grid…]
The remarks are the clearest indicator yet that the Pine Tree Power campaign has been driven by broader political goals of left-wing organizers in Maine and nationally.
If the ballot question succeeds, then Maine will attempt to purchase the Maine-based assets of the companies that own Central Maine Power and Versant, Maine’s largest electricity distribution utilities.
Historically, Maine’s easy ballot initiative process has been used by out-of-state and national political interests as a testing ground for left-wing policies. If radical movements can notch a victory in Maine, then it makes it easier to replicate those policies in other states.
According to campaign finance records, Our Power received significant early financial backing from one wealthy family in San Francisco, California.
Campaign finance records show that Tom Preston-Werner, a billionaire software developer who lives in San Francisco, and his wife have given $150,000 to the Our Power committee through their nonprofit Preston-Werner Initiatives Inc. and a company under their control, 128 Collective.
In January, the 128 Collective gave Our Power $100,000; last September, the committee got $50,000 from Preston-Werner Initiatives.
The committee has also received $25,000 from the Green Advocacy Project, a Washington, D.C.-based organization founded by Michael Kieschnick.
That’s not to say that some Mainers aren’t chipping in.
Among the largest donors to the committee is Susan Bartovics of North Haven. She’s given more than $106,250. Gary Friedmann, a consultant located in Bar Harbor, has given $45,000.
Most of the donors to Our Power are from in-state; however, some nonprofit organizations working on the effort do not have to disclose their donors.
[RELATED: Swiss Billionaire Funds Tax-the-Rich Liberals in Maine…]
Aligned groups, like 350.org, the Sierra Club, and several Maine-based nonprofits that receive funding through Arabella Advisors, are listed as members of the Our Power coalition.
The Our Power committee has reported small in-kind contributions from these organizations, but the original source of funding for those nonprofits remains mostly unknown.
When the money is shuffled through various for-profit and nonprofit organizations, it can be next to impossible to discern the extent to which out-of-state money, and even money from foreign nationals, is influencing Maine politics.
Who in their right mind would give Rose DuBois (it) or any other socialist control over a lemonade stand let alone a power company?
ME Infidel, Why is our entire state allowing Mills to destroy it as she has been so successfully doing? Instead of staying here and standing up to this evil, people are like rats deserting the proverbial sinking ship. It’s pathetic.
Folks, be sure to spread this article far and wide so more voters will be well informed when making a decision on this Communist initiative this falls.
That’s the least we can do to try and save Maine from these radical ideas.
Suzannah, I really don’t blame people leaving here for states that are more sane than this one. I’ve also thought about jumping ship, but Maine is MY home and I’m not going to let these scumbag Marxists make me leave. I really believe there are more of US than THEM but they are currently more vocal. I hope that’s going to change.
ME Infidel
It’s not that hard to call Rose she.
I dont get why so many conservatives support this. I mean I know they say our critical infrastructure should not be owned by the foreign govments from the middle east that own CMP. And they say this keeps money in the state and there is free market competition for the operator instead of a monopoly. But I think these are all just excuses. They should listen to Janet Mills and support CMP.
I noticed that even our former Republican State Senate President is for Yes on 3 also. I guess a lot of people agree that Mills and CMP are in bed.
https://youtu.be/QIJZ8a1PNBg?si=2fkjr22GqxRaR9Tp
Big Money is extremely effective in getting people to vote against their best interest. If you remove the profit incentive in a business, your costs go down for the people. Yes it’s democratic socialism. (Not communism!). You know the same socialism that raises your kids, polices your streets and puts the fire out at your hom e People are accustomed to socialism supporting our schools because they grew up with it, they don’t even know how to question it or analyze its effectiveness. Were just blindly taught its wrong). What I’m getting at is the power supply in Maine is a monopoly and if that’s what your comfortable with I get it, but don’t complain about the cost. Personally, I agree with utilities being owned by the people. As for the comment above about conservative’s vs progressives; Never forget if it wasn’t for progressives, you wouldn’t have a United States of America. Thankfully the radical patriots defeated the Tories and Red Coats. Just something to think about.