{"id":12517,"date":"2017-11-14T12:00:05","date_gmt":"2017-11-14T17:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.themainewire.com\/?p=12517"},"modified":"2017-11-14T12:00:05","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T17:00:05","slug":"climate-change-policy-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.themainewire.com\/2017\/11\/climate-change-policy-constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate change policy and the Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"
The United States needs a climate change policy grounded in and consistent with the Constitution. We don\u2019t have one.<\/p>\n
The incoherence and ineffectiveness of our current climate policies are a consequence of the unconstitutional, extraconstitutional and swamp-weasel approaches practiced by previous presidential administrations. Clinton refused to take Kyoto to the Senate for ratification; Bush refused to \u201cunsign it\u201d or to take it the Senate, and Obama and John Kerry negotiated the Paris \u201cagreement\u201d as a \u201cvoluntary\u201d international agreement not requiring Senate approval. Trump withdrew the US from Paris, but making the Senate vote on it would have been the best strategy for achieving a climate change policy grounded in the Constitution – and for dealing with swamp-weasels.<\/p>\n
Here are some of the numerous ways that climate change policy is violating, skirting or simply ignoring the Constitution:<\/p>\n
Until our climate change policy is firmly grounded in the Constitution, it will continue to be divisive, ineffective and unsustainable. A good start would be an up or down Congressional vote on the Paris Treaty and the regional agreements, especially as blue states seek to implement Paris despite President Trump\u2019s withdrawal. I have asked both my Senators to do that, with no response. Next stop, Senator Inhofe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The United States needs a climate change policy grounded in and consistent with the Constitution. We don\u2019t have one. The incoherence and ineffectiveness of our current climate policies are a consequence of the unconstitutional, extraconstitutional and swamp-weasel approaches practiced by previous presidential administrations. Clinton refused to take Kyoto to the Senate for ratification; Bush refused<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":10984,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1278],"tags":[962,1556,266,539,1288],"class_list":{"0":"post-12517","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-commentary","8":"tag-climate-change","9":"tag-commentary","10":"tag-energy","11":"tag-energy-policy","12":"tag-featured"},"yoast_head":"\n