{"id":12517,"date":"2017-11-14T12:00:05","date_gmt":"2017-11-14T17:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.themainewire.com\/?p=12517"},"modified":"2017-11-14T12:00:05","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T17:00:05","slug":"climate-change-policy-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.themainewire.com\/2017\/11\/climate-change-policy-constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate change policy and the Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"

The United States needs a climate change policy grounded in and consistent with the Constitution. We don\u2019t have one.<\/p>\n

The incoherence and ineffectiveness of our current climate policies are a consequence of the unconstitutional, extraconstitutional and swamp-weasel approaches practiced by previous presidential administrations. Clinton refused to take Kyoto to the Senate for ratification; Bush refused to \u201cunsign it\u201d or to take it the Senate, and Obama and John Kerry negotiated the Paris \u201cagreement\u201d as a \u201cvoluntary\u201d international agreement not requiring Senate approval. Trump withdrew the US from Paris, but making the Senate vote on it would have been the best strategy for achieving a climate change policy grounded in the Constitution – and for dealing with swamp-weasels.<\/p>\n

Here are some of the numerous ways that climate change policy is violating, skirting or simply ignoring the Constitution:<\/p>\n